- The rights to "Sinners" will revert to the film's director, Ryan Coogler, in 2050.
- Veteran entertainment and technology attorney Jonathan Handel explained how Coogler could cash in.
- "He's definitely betting that it will have value in 25 years," Handel said.
After years of making films based on existing IP like Marvel comics and Apollo Creed, Ryan Coogler finally made an original movie. It could pay dividends for the rest of his life.
The unique terms of Coogler's deal with Warner Bros. for his genre-bending vampire movie "Sinners" give the 38-year-old filmmaker ownership of the movie in 25 years, putting him in rare company with the likes of auteurs like Jim Jarmusch and Quentin Tarantino, both of whom have landed similar deals.
And with "Sinners" becoming a box office sensation — it's brought in over $200 million domestically, making it the second-highest-grossing North American release in 2025 — Coogler could have his hands under a moneymaking faucet.
"He's making a lot of money off it now and has the potential to make money 25 years from now through ownership," Jonathan Handel, a veteran entertainment and technology attorney with the law firm Feig Finkel, told Business Insider. "But he's rolling the dice."
Will that gamble pay off, and how, exactly, could Coogler make or lose money on the deal?
Though Handel hasn't seen the contract between Coogler and Warner Bros., he used his decades of experience writing contracts for directors and stars to walk us through some scenarios to explain what could happen when Coogler regains the rights to "Sinners."
Deals like Coogler's come with creative control — but they're not a blank check
There are various ways a filmmaker can come to own their own work. Some use a tactic known as a "negative pickup," in which the filmmaker finds the financing and makes the movie on their own, then sells the finished project to a studio, which distributes it and does the marketing.
M. Night Shyamalan did this with Universal for the 2019 thriller "Glass," and most recently, Francis Ford Coppola did it with Lionsgate for "Megalopolis."
Others self-distribute, side-stepping a studio or distributor and footing the bill for the entire release. For instance, Steven Soderbergh launched Fingerprint Releasing for the run of his 2017 heist movie "Logan Lucky," while Taylor Swift made deals directly with theater chains for the release of her Eras Tour concert movie in 2023.
But it's exceedingly rare to get a studio to agree to give the rights of one of its movies back to the filmmaker after some period of time.
Many of the auteurs who enjoy this perk got their start on the independent film scene, where the practice was more common. Jim Jarmusch has pushed to own most of his films, while Quentin Tarantino owns "Once Upon a Time... in Hollywood" because he made a deal with Sony that grandfathered him into the rights deal he'd had since the "Pulp Fiction" days with Harvey Weinstein at Miramax Films.
Creatively, the deal was something Coogler said he needed. He previously told Business Insider that his only motivation for the deal was to emphasize the film's themes of Black ownership, as the two main characters, both played by Michael B. Jordan, set out to own a juke joint in the Jim Crow South before things take a bloody turn.
Handel noted that by pushing for ownership in 2050, Coogler is literally and symbolically betting on himself, and the prospect that "Sinners" will still be in the public consciousness two-plus decades from now.
"Coogler would have gotten more money up front if he hadn't pushed for ownership," he said. "You have to give something to get something in negotiation. So he's definitely betting that it will have value in 25 years."
Coogler could score a major licensing deal if new technology changes how we consume movies after 2050
According to Handel, Coogler could really cash in if there's a major shift in the way we watch movies after he regains the rights to "Sinners."
For example, if we suddenly watch movies on an immersive 3D platform and "Sinners" is owned by Coogler, he could earn millions by landing licensing agreements to view the film in that format.
However, if that technology becomes the streaming of tomorrow before the rights to "Sinners" revert to Coogler in 25 years, the director could miss out, either because Warner Bros. could choose not to convert the title to that platform, or because of something called a "holdback," in which the copyright cannot revert to Coogler until certain conditions are met.
"In this instance, WB might do a holdback where there can be no new version created within five years of the rights reverting," Handel said.
Though this is only a hypothetical, Handel said it's an example of the level of complexity that could be in the contract Warner Bros. and Coogler signed.
Even if Coogler doesn't have the rights to 'Sinners' sequels, he could still cash in
The ending of "Sinners" hints at a potential franchise, and 25 years from now, Coogler would be in control to do whatever he wants in building that out. But chances are, Warner Bros. would want a sequel — maybe even more than one — a lot sooner than 2050.
When that moment comes, a lot of questions about payout will depend on who has the sequel rights. Reps for Coogler and Warner Bros. did not respond to a request for comment about who holds those rights.
Even if Coogler doesn't have the rights to the sequels, Handel said he would still benefit. Coogler would still presumably have profit participation on any sequels, as he did on the first movie, and if Warner Bros. wanted to do any kind of box set 25 years from now, they would have to make a deal with Coogler to have the first movie involved.
"He's got the upper hand, because if I'm Warners and I own the other pictures, I have to go to Ryan and do a deal with him," Handel said.
So, how much money could Coogler make once the "Sinners" rights revert to him? Reports from Matthew Belloni at Puck put that figure at about $1 million a year, based on the predictions of Hollywood insiders who focus on movie libraries and licensing deals. But Handel isn't confident that any figure can be put on the deal as of now.
"To contend that you can make a prediction like that is fantasy land," he told BI, noting that there are too many unknown variables to predict what Coogler could earn from "Sinners" 25 years in the future.
What he is sure of is that Coogler's deal has left the rest of Hollywood interested and intrigued: "The high-level directors are having conversations with their representatives about this."
